Thursday, November 23, 2006

Jughead Convo

Chester says:
so i guess the question really is
Chester says:
do you think a baby could eat another baby?
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
o_O
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
wtf kinda question is that mayne
Chester says:
...a hard one to prove
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
lol
Chester says:
so...do you?
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
no
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
well wait
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
depends on what species it is
Chester says:
O.o...human
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
ok then no
Chester says:
why not?
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
cus its practically impossible
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
theyd be able to only gum them to death
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
couldnt really eat them
Chester says:
oh like a baby is tought to chew
Chester says:
they barely got musle or anything
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
exactly
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
point proven
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
next question
Chester says:
lets say you blend one baby
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
oh
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
stfu
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
lol
Chester says:
lol
Chester says:
therefore the bones and what not are all liquified and baby-friendly....which is kinda backward when you think of it
*~ThE eXsTaSy Is NoT In ThE dRuG, iTs In ThE pErSoN~* says:
ur a sick individual